Showing posts with label Bush. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bush. Show all posts

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Ahead of the Curve: Harvard Business School Book mixes with our government’s recent history

I just finished up Ahead of the Curve: Two Years at Harvard Business School by Philip Delves Broughton, a memoir about his recent experience as a graduate student at Harvard Business School, class of 2006. Considered by most as the pinnacle school to receive that prestigious MBA at, Broughton’s story (and the title aptly reflects) on what we should be considering during these difficult times, and on the people who make these decisions.
As a first aside, President George W. Bush (’75) and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson graduated from Harvard Business. President-elect Barack Obama received his Juris Doctorate from Harvard. Michael Bloomberg, New York City mayor, amongst other things, is a MBA from Harvard. The always quick-to-be-proud of his business acumen, ex-presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, did his work at the Crimson. And today, on the 45th anniversary of his assassination, it should be noted Kennedy graduated from Harvard (cum laude) in 1940, majoring in government. (Thus the Kennedy School of Government.)

So indeed, being a Harvard grad has its potential perks and peaks of power.

Englishman Broughton wrote for a living before stepping into the hallowed foray that is Harvard. As a neophyte to the world of banking, finance, hedge funds and leverage buyouts, he got a crash course in what is the terminology, psychology and manipulations of business numbers, and where it would lead him even before he got started on his two-year trek. As he soon learned, there are no clear answers; just measurements of risk and reward, possibilities defined better, and the balance of what is important to know in business, and in life.

Relating to current financial malaise, a passage from the Ahead of the Curve:
“…I once asked a hedge fund manager in New York about the reckless way credit
was sold to people who could ill afford it. I said they would be ruined. They
would lose their homes and their possessions. Where were the checks on all of
this? What would happen to all these firms lending like crazy when people
stopped paying back their loans? The hedge fund manager looked at me like I was
a madman and said, ‘It’s just economic.’ He meant that over time these borrowers
would learn their lesson. The bankrupted lenders would be bought cheaply by
other investors and turned around. The economic wheel would keep turning, no
matter how many lives had been crushed against it…” (pgs. 232-233)

As we have seen with the demise of Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearnes, WaMu, IndyMac and others likely in the queue (GM, Chrysler, Lear), the economic wheel is spinning quite well as it has indeed crushed retirement funds, and stocks and put people out of work in droves. (Citigroup announcing 50,000+ in job cuts in one week.)

Our current leader, George W. Bush, seems to have adopted a technique not-as-yet-perfected when he attended Harvard, but discussed in Ahead of the Curve, the levering up through debt. This preferred technique, of financing a buyout mainly through debt, thus recording interest paid as an expense (on that debt), produces more return on equity, to equity stakeholders, thus making them extremely happy. It works if you produce a profit, can generate the cash to pay the interest payments, and can keep other expenses down, preferably through frugality to all other concerns. At some point, you take the enterprise public again with all the miscellaneous expenses cut, but likely only a real benefit to the LBO starters of the once-fat company. The actual company, the workers, are unlikely to have received any benefits.

(2nd aside) How this relates to our current government: During the Bush administration, we have ‘levered up’ the balance sheet of the United States. Taking on more debt, trying (but not succeeding) to trim other programs (those nasty entitlements) while keeping taxes on those multi-millionaires low, even giving a tax holiday to them for a decade. The low-interest rates that spurred out-of-control lending to the non-financially savvy, and the opportunists, that both got caught in the wheels of sub-prime and housing market free falls, has loaded up more debt on the U.S. Treasury balance sheet. We continue to make our interest payments on a $10,000,000,000,000 national debt, of at least $500,000,000,000. But when do we run out of fiat money? (At least if you don’t print and print, devaluing our currency to the point of worthlessness.)

But as we’ve also seen, the entities under the auspices of too much leverage have indeed failed when the cash flows stopped to these many, many banks, insurance companies, manufacturers, retailers, and now, oil entities. The deflation of the value of things is reminiscent of the Great Depression.

We are now Behind the Eight Ball: What Harvard Business School Did Not Teach President Bush.

With a new President, Obama will have to get well ahead of the curve in order to stave off the impending doomsday scenario discuss on more than one occasion here, and now, at many other media outlets.

As Broughton also learned, business is not solely the most important entity – as ex-CEO of GE Jack Welch had surmised, quite smugly – as the government too, has its place. For one, without a government in operation, a business cannot protect its interest via laws or the enforcement of contracts. (A business would have to act as a thug to accomplish contract enforcement. Essentially, become a government entity with enforcers and judges of people’s misdeeds.)
The argument made by Welch, that government generates no revenues, and business generates all the money, so we can ignore governance, leaves aside that a symbiotic relationship has always existed. Businesses can exist without government, but only for so long as people ascribe to obeying business edicts. Otherwise, chaos and revolt and failure soon comes. Governments can exist only if people are willing, and led to accept its rules, and abide under its control. And provides some benefit, else why have it. Neither operates in a vacuum.

The book presents Broughton engrossed in the whys of how he decided on Harvard B-School, only to not go immediately from there to a big corporate job, either as an marketing/product manager at Google, a hedge fund operator at Bain, an overworked, type-A financier on The Street, or a start-up city controller as he envisioned in one entrepreneurial leap-of-faith posited. Mr. Broughton’s book maybe a business school companion volume of One L by Scott Turow, the exploration of what it is to become a legal mind and those ramifications, but it truly reflects, that writers, are what they are: able to mirror, emote, characterize, judge and divine truth when at their best.

That somewhere on the curve, there is a path to another road, with another curve to come out ahead on.

Friday, August 1, 2008

Short selling your readers: Hey I might as well, given Wall Street

I will try to produce more relevant posts in the future. I realize I get too far afield from my main interests, but, it is more interesting to write (and learn while doing it) about a wide array of things.

I choose to be a bit different than the attention-seeking types that have infested the blog world. They have their place. They make their claims to popularity and make a few coins while they are at it. Hey, if I could really turn this into a mint, printing Yuans at a fever pitch, I would. But then I would have to move to the People's Republic. (Not in this lifetime - maybe my next one.)

So whatever you see, or hear, here, it is likely a hodge-podge of thoughts, feelings and concerns. Hey, I can focus on the Chicago Cubs all I like. Or Bush's idiocy. There's plenty of material on both. We got financial markets in a rollcoaster ride - all those SIVs, CDOs, NINJAs are coming back on them hard. A Balance of Payment situation - thanks to all those imports and Nixon and his suspension of a Gold Standard. We got oil and refineries running in weird ways - like 25 cent price jumps in one day!

Darfur gets another year of inadequate defense - because you know, the U.S. doesn't want to take part in any real stoppage of injustice. Middle East...like the Wild, Wild West.

Personally, I'll be 36 in 4 days. And so much the poorer for it. I'm suppose to grow into happiness as I get older, while females get less satisfaction from their old age. Well, I've always been a bit on the margins of anything...

If I could solve anything in my own life, the world would beckon. I could fix a local government or two. Maybe get people to stop putting up with democrats and republicans (notice I didn't capitalize them.) Vote some real people with real ideas.

But, I guess Obama has his work cut out for him, assuming that latent racism of America doesn't kick in. And believe me, I don't think being President will be a fun ride between 2009-2013.

I'll write more next week. Later.

Thursday, December 6, 2007

Standard AND POOR: The Mortgage Concerns lead Bush to come along

Joke: How many idiots does it take to screw in a light bulb? (End of post the answer)


(Author's Note: I do not own a home. Nor Have I ever paid a mortgage...just rented for decade.)



With the current prospect of Mortgage resets and foreclosures and the potential Subprime egg foo yung on the lenders' faces, President Bush (via Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson Jr.) has unveiled a bailout program for potentially 1.8 million persons facing this debilitating situation.





This situation arose in early 2007 out of lending money to buy homes to people securing Low-Doc or No-Doc loans, those with minimal or no documentation, who, as a result, get higher interest rates on their Mortgages. The lenders such as Countrywide (see chart left) soon found that many defaulted on their mortgage, which in turn drove the stock down.



This lending practice is often seen as predatory, since the lender will take over the asset. However, since the price of real estate has plummeted in various areas of the country (Ohio, Michigan, Nevada and some large cities) the lender is now face with the reality of selling an asset at $.70-$.80 on the dollar.



Meanwhile, since the prices of real estate fell, other speculators and those who secured teaser rate ARMs are suddenly in mortgages where the reset rate is too high to pay, and the real estate price has dropped below the outstanding principal on the loan. (Upside down equity.)





From investopedia.com:


The use of teaser rates tends to grow dramatically during times when long-term interest rates move toward historical lows. Lenders stand to make much more money on ARMs if interest rates
rise
, while borrowers with ARMs will be faced with high interest
payments. (This was the case in early-to-mid 2007 as the bond market reach very
high plateaus
.)


But Along Came Paulson.



In the post-Katrina, Post-hoc 2006 election, the President's response to this is admirable, if (to me) politically motivated. The Republicans certainly don't want to see as too mean on hard-working, taxpaying, home-owning citizens, especially with a Presidential election laying out in the grassy knowl. And granted, many of these people need help to stave off foreclosure or homelessness.



But several questions arise:


1. How many of you have been bailed out after you made a financial decision that was unwise?


2. Do we think this is really about the borrowers or the lenders, who must maintain profitability and therefore, keep the borrowers paying something to them?


3. Is government interference healthy here?


4. Should I care if big corporation A goes under due to haphazard lending and market assessment?


5. What if these borrowers can't get long-term financing and default anyways?


6. Should the case-by-case situation be done electronically - to see who qualifies (not a $250,000-a-year earner), what the property value is (if over $750,000 for example, they might be declined) or whether there is a more efficient way to get renegotiated contracts?

As the NY Times reports:





Despite the criticism, the Bush plan is a significant change in an initial
reluctance to impose solutions. As recently as a month ago, Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. argued that lenders should try to work out new terms on a
case-by-case basis.

But Mr. Paulson and federal banking regulators became increasingly
impatient with the industry’s failure to produce a systematic, rapid approach to
evaluating borrowers. Sheila C. Bair, chairman of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation
, proposed a comparatively radical plan to
permanently freeze rates on all subprime loans. Mr. Paulson rejected that idea,
but began to push for a standardized approach that would temporarily freeze
rates for many borrowers facing upward adjustments on their monthly payments.

Administration officials emphasized that the rate freeze was only one
part of a broader plan. Mr. Bush will also ask Congress to temporarily expand
the authority of states and localities to issue tax-exempt mortgage-revenue
bonds to help people refinance their mortgages. Treasury officials are also
pushing the industry to come up with a streamlined way to help subprime
borrowers refinance with a more conventional, lower-rate mortgage...

You don’t want to reward speculators,” said Senator John
McCain
of Arizona, who is running for the Republican nomination. “You’d
like to take each individual case on its own, but there’s no time to do that.
What’s important is to stop the bleeding
.”


Whether this is called a workout plan or a bailout, I wonder exactly how deep is the crap the investment banks and financing companies are shovelling to the public. How far down will it go? That has been on the minds of people like (Erin Burnett, CNBC, below left) and numerous other talking heads at the various outlets.



The number of foreclosures in 2006 were 1.3 million, up by 42% from 2005. And based on filings in the 1st quarter of 2007, the number escalated even higher. Is there an end in sight? (The article linked appeared in April 2007.)

From Business Week article:
The same day Bush unveiled his plan, the Mortgage Bankers Assn. said that foreclosures had reached a record high in the third quarter. The share of mortgages that have entered foreclosure hit 0.78% in the quarter, up from the previous high of 0.65% set in the previous quarter. At the same time, delinquencies for all mortgages rose to 5.59%, from 5.12%, in the second quarter. None of the people who are delinquent or facing foreclosure will be helped by the plan.

The deal almost certainly won't stop the decline in housing prices. Investors are betting that there will be double-digit declines (BusinessWeek.com, 11/27/07) in home prices in nine of 10 major markets over the next year. The only exception is Chicago, and there the estimate is for a 5.6% drop in home prices (BusinessWeek.com, 11/27/07).

Now, Wall Street (investors) are pissed off now because:
1. Government interference in the precious free market is a no-no
2. They can not accurately predict what the market will do on the semi-predictable stocks, and thus their money will have to be on the sidelines, or lower yielding investments
3. Lawsuits can only arise, thus making it difficult to react
4. They will be just like the average, everyday, ordinary you and me (except richer)


Paulson believes that: "THE APPROACH ANNOUNCED TODAY IS NOT A SILVER BULLET. WE FACE A DIFFICULT PROBLEM FOR WHICH THERE IS NO PERFECT SOLUTION. TODAY’ S ANNOUNCEMENT IS A SIGNIFICANT STEP. I KNOW EVERYONE HERE HAS WORKED VERY HARD SINCE AUGUST AND WE WILL CONTINUE WORKING. AS EVENTS UNFOLD, OUR APPROACH WILL CONTINUE TO ADAPT AND EVOLVE."

No matter what the Standard & Poor 500 will still be moving tomorrow, and that is what it is all about, ain't it???

Answer: The United States Government.














Friday, July 13, 2007

A Blog about Nothing: Just for today

It's Friday...That's the reason. So why not a blog about nothing. Seinfeld made a mint on the idea.

It's sunny, 75, and my mind isn't into much of mood to write you why George Bush has to be the worst President ever (unless the stock market is your bag) or Dick Cheney must be the most powerful Co-President in existence. Or that Mark Cuban has tossed his hat in the ring for the purchase of my beloved, much maligned Chicago Cubs. Course I had to reference a friggin' blogger to make this a blog worth reading. (No time to do my own research.)

I need to go get a pizza pie and fill my gluttoness need. Or down a pint or two at the pub. Or find a woman named Elaine that isn't too hideous or too much like Julia Louis Dreyfuss on Seinfeld. Don't need her issues to be as quirky as mine right now.

The Blog about Nothing is out there for your eyes to scan. I knew that couldn't be resisted.

Have Good Nothing Weekends! I'll be back on Monday...unless I land in the pokey for something yet to be determined.