Chapter 14 of My Life and Times at Purdue University
In thinking over a conversation started last night, the
following flows out of all things a vulgar (meant: humorous) response I had.
A
woman I’ve known better via the net than in real life (even though we attended
high school and were friends as that time frame allowed), put a question up as
to what cure-all elixir would we create for all humanity. I took the humor
route: a frigidity pill.
While only humorous to most men, the topic progressed
(digressed) on to the pertinent idea of investments. In relationships, we have
to do this always. Time and money are the fuel to making one’s love, or
friendship life more rewarding. If you don’t, the whole mess will get rather
barren pretty soon. And the return on investment (ROI) becomes negative, and more
questionable, down the road.
In economics study, such investments are geared toward
funding projects, starting up new businesses, and acquisition of materials to
build up, replace, or lay the framework for a new system. (Unless you are Wall Street – then – you create
“financial engineering and innovation.”)
But these investments (monetary or time-constrained) can tend towards
the personal satisfaction or welfare as my macroeconomics textbook writer, Harvard
professor Greg Mankiw, wrote on his blog posting, “Good Academic, Bad HumanBeing” at gregmankiw.blogspot.com:
“It all comes down to the
definition of ‘good academic economist.’ If your goal is to maximize the
probability of winning a Nobel prize, or at least to climb up as high as you
can on citation rankings, then this
advice is correct. [Regarding success
and focus in graduate school, and on into, academia.] Real world experiences
and outside interests are a distraction. Don't take time off from academic
pursuits for a job in public policy. Don't ever work on Wall Street or do any
consulting. Don't engage in the broader societal debate by writing op-eds or
working on political campaigns. All of that takes time away from getting papers
published in academic journals.
But don't stop there. If you have this objective, then it is best not to have hobbies, or read novels, or go to the movies. Don't spend time teaching well or mentoring students, except the very best students who can help you with your research. Don't get married or have friends, unless your spouse and friends are PhD economists and can coauthor papers with you. Whatever you do, don't have children--boy, are they a time sink! And if you make the mistake of having children, make sure you spend as little time with them as you can.”
But don't stop there. If you have this objective, then it is best not to have hobbies, or read novels, or go to the movies. Don't spend time teaching well or mentoring students, except the very best students who can help you with your research. Don't get married or have friends, unless your spouse and friends are PhD economists and can coauthor papers with you. Whatever you do, don't have children--boy, are they a time sink! And if you make the mistake of having children, make sure you spend as little time with them as you can.”
Very funny, and often, I have felt and acted this way too.
For a decade, I have
not gone out with a woman. I have made only minor investments of time and money
into such situations. And low and behold, my investments have been all lost! A
female reading would say, “how about being friends first? Or what did you expect
out of your burger or talking-her-to-death-to-get-to-know-her strategy?” You
are right. But a greater point is to be had here. [And more reasons why I did as such...some readers may even know.]
In life, there are some persons that will never get much
from social contact. They go down a different track, find themselves unable to
divert to the well-rounded normalcy of life well-led, so-called, by a modestly
pretentious professor at an elitist university. These quirky people’s investments
are tied to a desire for intense study, designing, creative research, and a
lasting legacy based on the giving up on the family cookouts, the nights at the
theatre, the frolicking in the sack, and the joys of ballgames with the little
ones. It is an opportunity cost; that which is forsaken for the investment in another,
hopefully, creative and lasting endeavor towards the betterment of humanity.
As discussed in the Preface section, many economists were of
suspect character, or unusual living aspects. The “dismal science” is filled to the gills
with characters you would not want as “dad” or “mom.” Yet, some find that work, too – and either have
life balance, or divorce, I suppose.
For my own part, I wonder what choices to make. I certainly
have a desire for a family, a wife, kid(s), etc. But I am once again on the
cusp of forty. Not that it means it is over, but time is not on my side in that
game. And since we’ve discussed my mediocrity in that pursuit in Chapter 1, it
is rather pointless to believe I’ll become like these players (PUAs) called: “The Gambler” or “Mystery”, who, have mastered the subtle communication dance, the
verbal pacing of their sexual prey, and thus, the acquisition of their modest human
assets, “invigorating their flesh”, when out “clubbing.” (Again, female reading
– it is more complex than that. But picture painted. I am The 40-year Virgin movie.)
Unlike said females, whom are blessed (if seemingly cursed),
to be a creative force through natural child birth, lonely male souls stay as
such. Seems mundane, but women do have that leg up. Likely, as not, a few guys
deemed it useful to put their efforts into masterpieces of art, or literature,
or construction trades, solely due to the jealousy (or the humiliating
rejection) of a woman. Better than the other alternatives.
What we treasure is based on our goals. Citation rankings are just like NFL
power rankings. Or Fortune 500 best
CEO rankings. Or maybe, Maxim’s 100
hottest women decided by readers. It is chart of progress, or lack, in our
lives. A measuring system since there is a clearly definable or visibly
attainable goal or trophy – to climb towards, or achieve. While it is seen as
crass, many “normal people” laud praise on this progression up the charts even
with the sacrifices made to being more “normally human”, whatever that means in
this expanding world spectrum. While too, in God’s eyes, it gets us nowhere;
for some, it is all they have left before they meet the “Big Kahuna in Sky.” The
making due with the talents or skills you have, ignoring the opportunity costs of
another avenue.
My opportunity cost
will be at the end game of this college run. What will it be? – to be continued…and contemplated.
No comments:
Post a Comment